REVUEI
La Roche-Posay

Effaclar Duo+M

Historical review rating has not been published on Revuei for this product.

At a glance

US Effaclar Duo+M with 0.5% salicylic acid; Ulta lists this package as 1.35 oz.

What to check

  • Confirm the US formula and package at the store. This is distinct from the older benzoyl-peroxide Effaclar Duo; no historical rating is attached.
Product details

An acne-treatment format, as recorded, for blemish-prone skin, recorded at 1.35 oz from a Ulta listing.

Additional limitations

  • The recorded product name is Effaclar Duo+M, not Duo M.
  • Check current price and availability on Amazon; checkout price and local stock remain unconfirmed.
  • No eligible historical rating sample was available in the inputs used for this page.

View options on Amazon (paid link)Sources and limitations

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Choose available options and check the seller and current price on Amazon.

Sources and limitations

Recorded specification snapshot. Recorded listing facts describe that capture; current price and stock must be checked on Amazon. Browse acne treatments; available historical review charts are shown separately.

Format
Acne treatment
Recorded listing
Ulta US · SKU 2640396
Recorded size
1.35 oz

Sources

US brand and Ulta sources checked 12 Oct 2026: this US product uses 0.5% salicylic acid. Do not transfer formula or review claims from the older benzoyl-peroxide product or other regions.

Evidence status, scope and publication limits

Product facts recorded from a Ulta listing (SKU 2640396) and the brand page. No eligible historical rating sample was available in the inputs used for this page.

Before you decide: evidence limits

  • Identity is not merged with the generic Effaclar family; do not assume a shared review pool.
  • The format is recorded as Acne treatment; no efficacy claim is made here.

Same-use alternatives

Other treatments: browse skincare. For an oil-control serum see the The Ordinary Niacinamide 10% + Zinc 1%.

These are catalogue links, not claims about equivalence.