With Ceramides product image. Confirm current packaging when buying.

The Ordinary

Hyaluronic Acid 2% + B5 with Ceramides

At a glance · 99-comment analysis subset

Hydration and a light feel recur in this archived sample. Dryness, layering problems and some reported reactions make individual fit worth checking.

View options on Amazon (paid link)See review charts

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Choose available options and check the seller and current price on Amazon.

What people valued

Some records describe improved moisture and quick absorption.
Price and using small amounts are recurring reasons people valued it.

What to weigh up

Other records describe dryness, pilling or a texture they did not like.
Comfort and breakout reports include negative experiences; a high sample average is not a safety guarantee.

With Ceramides and Original Formulation are distinct versions. Historical records do not establish the bottle or batch sold today.

What these review records tell us

Purchase verification and reported use are different. An unmarked comment is not evidence of a non-purchase or a fake review.

100All archived records

99Experience-analysis subset, including brief opinions

0Marked verified purchase by the sourceNo group score available

Source purchase markers · all 100 records

Marked verified purchase: 0 / 100 (0%)
Not marked verified: 100 / 100 (100%)
Marker field missing: 0 / 100

These are source labels, not independently verified transactions or a count of people. Purchase elsewhere, gifts, family use and account history are not resolved by an absent badge.

Why one comment is shown separately

One author says reading other reviews led them not to buy. No direct use of this listing product is described. Their comment and comment remain in the 100-record overview; the comment is discussed separately from the 99 reported-use records. We do not label it fake or infer earlier purchases, identity or prior-formula use.

Source-verified purchase group · 0 records

No record in this captured sample carries the source verified-purchase marker. A mean or experience percentage cannot be calculated for this group. This does not mean zero satisfaction, zero risk or no buyers.

Experience analysis · 99-record subset

These 99 comments were analyzed for experience themes, including brief opinions and family observations. Use and purchase are not independently verified. Every experience bar uses 99 as its denominator. Gray means not discussed; stripes mean unresolved attribution. The separate discussion remains in the 100-record overview above.

Hydration & dryness

32/ 99 confirmed mentions · 62 not discussed · 5 unresolved

Positive 27
Negative 5

What this includes

Includes reported moisture or dryness changes, not measured hydration.

Texture, absorption & layering

31/ 99 confirmed mentions · 63 not discussed · 5 unresolved

Positive 22
Negative 8
Mixed 1

What this includes

Includes lightness, stickiness, absorption and layering/pilling. Preference determines direction.

Price & product lasting

24/ 99 confirmed mentions · 73 not discussed · 2 unresolved

Positive 21
Negative 2
Mixed 1

What this includes

Perceived price and product lasting; not measured cost per application.

Comfort & irritation

6/ 99 confirmed mentions · 93 not discussed · 0 unresolved

Positive 2
Negative 4

What this includes

Includes direct caregiver observations. Reported reactions are not verified diagnoses or incidence rates.

Breakout experiences

8/ 99 confirmed mentions · 91 not discussed · 0 unresolved

Positive 6
Negative 2

What this includes

Fewer or no new breakouts share a positive label; this does not establish acne treatment.

Scent

3/ 99 confirmed mentions · 96 not discussed · 0 unresolved

Positive 3

What this includes

Only a few reports discuss scent. Sensory experience does not establish fragrance ingredients.

Questions before buying

Is this the original formula?

No. This page is for the with Ceramides listing. The brand distinguishes it from its richer original version. Open the separate original-formulation page.

Will the texture work under my other products?

Archived records include light or fast-absorbing feel as well as pilling and disliked texture. Less tackiness was not a positive for every writer. These experiences do not establish compatibility with your own routine.

Does the rating mean it is irritation-free?

No. The sample includes reported reactions, including caregiver observations. They are not independently diagnosed causes or population risk rates. Follow the brand's patch-test and stop-use guidance.

Where should I check the current price?

Check Amazon for the current seller, options, price and checkout total. The historical Ulta listing remains a source reference, not an Amazon quote.

How the brand says to use it

Morning and eveningUse a few drops on the face, on intact skin.
Check tolerancePatch-test first. If irritation occurs, rinse, stop use and seek medical advice. Keep away from children.

Brand directions, checked 12 Oct 2026; not a personalized regimen. Read the current directions and ingredient list.

Sample, sources and limitations

What this analysis covers

All 100 captured records from Ulta's with Ceramides listing remain in the overview: 426 star points / 100 = 4.26. The experience-analysis subset has 99 comments, including brief opinions and family observations: 425 / 99 = 4.29. One purchase-before-use discussion remains in the overview and is described separately. No record has the source verified-purchase marker; unmarked does not mean non-buyer. Use, identity and independence have not been independently verified. These counts are records, not people.

Six experience topics were read in full and coded by AI, with an additional model review and documented adjudication. The99 reported-use records have 99 distinct stored text hashes; distinct text is not proof of independent consumers or authenticity. This is not human-reviewed. The archive sampled 4 pages when the provider reported 1314 reviews; it is not exhaustive or representative.

Recorded collection:24 Aug 2026. Current-formula continuity remains unverified; version context is unclear in 6 records and one explicitly compares old and new. Theme ambiguity is retained instead of assigned a favorable direction. Positive and negative topics can coexist in a record; totals across topics therefore need not sum to 100%.

Retailer listing and brand facts were checked 12 Oct 2026. The brand labels this a water-based serum and lists vegan and cruelty-free claims; these are brand statements, not an independent certification. Brand sizes 30/60 ml and retailer 1.0 oz are retained as labeled, without a unit-conversion claim.

Analysis version: ceramides-fulltext-context-recode-20261012-v1. Raw review text and identities are not republished.