Cleansing & makeup removal
98/213 mention · 4 unresolved
- Positive 90
- Negative 4
- Mixed 3
- Unclear 1

Historical reports often describe effective cleansing without tightness, alongside dryness and irritation counterexamples.
View options on Amazon (paid link)Sources and limitationsReview charts
Choose size and other available options on Amazon; check the seller and current price there. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Check the brand product page · Checked 2026-10-12
Brand statements, not a guarantee of personal tolerance or an independently checked certification. Ingredients can change; check your package.
water; glycerin; coco-glucoside; sodium cocoyl glycinate; acrylates copolymer; caprylyl glycol; mica; sodium chloride; 1,2-hexanediol; titanium dioxide; sodium hydroxide; disodium EDTA
Brand-listed ingredients; check your own package for the current batch. Not an independent formula test.
Facial cleanser. The historical review sample includes different pack sizes. Choose available options and check the current price on Amazon; check your package for ingredients.
The headline score and theme charts can use different subsets. Counts are review records, not independently verified people.
The full archive overview may include records assigned to other products or with unresolved rating objects. It is shown for transparency, not as a current-product or current-formula score. A stored star is an opinion; it does not prove use or purchase.
Original purchase-marker evidence has not been established for these 221 archived records. The totals marked verified or unmarked by the source are unknown; they are not zero.
The retained archive has 221 records; the current headline pool has 213, with 213 stored integer stars. Records outside the displayed subset remain archived. Product-identity flags and missing stars are separate from purchase status.
Where themes are published, their stated subset and topic denominators apply. Missing purchase marks do not remove a comment from that analysis. Classification of use, identity or authenticity cannot be inferred from a badge.
A source-verified marker is a platform label, not independent proof of a transaction or a unique person. Source-unmarked is not the same as non-buyer, unused or fake. A missing original marker stays unknown. Gifts, family observations, purchases elsewhere and account history cannot be resolved from this field alone.
Cleansing has 90 positive, 4 negative and 3 mixed reports. After-wash comfort has 68 positive and 14 negative reports; irritation has 11 negative reports. These accounts cannot predict your response.
Each bar uses records mentioning that topic; unresolved records remain outside the bar. Counts are not probabilities of results.
Gentleness-positive includes subjective gentle-feel reports or explicitly no irritation; it is not a count of proven irritation-free use. Texture includes lather and after-wash feel. Family-reported experiences remain single review records.
98/213 mention · 4 unresolved
84/213 mention · 3 unresolved
132/213 mention · 14 unresolved
39/213 mention · 0 unresolved
45/213 mention · 16 unresolved
19/213 mention · 2 unresolved
10/213 mention · 0 unresolved
Manufacturer listing · recorded 5 Oct 2026. Ulta 8 fl oz listing · historical listing source checked 11 Oct 2026. This source is separate from the Amazon purchase link and the historical rating; it does not establish Amazon pricing.
213 retained cleanser records from 221 archived Ulta PowerReviews records, 2016-01-08 to 2026-08-18 (UTC). One explicit face-lotion record and seven product-uncertain brand or family-wide records were left out. Reviews include different pack sizes; current formula, current merchant options and independent shoppers are not verified by this sample.
All 221 titles and full bodies were processed with model-assisted coding. A targeted independent model review and coordinator adjudication checked negation, other products, missing topics and ambiguous identities. This is not an independently validated human gold standard.
Each topic separates mentioned, not mentioned and unresolved records. Positive, negative, mixed, neutral and unclear directions sum to that topic's mentioning count. The bar uses that count as its denominator.
Reports involving other skincare steps do not isolate this cleanser's effect. Breakout-positive includes improvement or explicitly no new breakouts, not acne-treatment efficacy. Reported irritation is not proof of causation or a population risk estimate. Packaging reports may refer to different sizes. Review bodies and reviewer identities are not republished.
Keeping the first record per identical body gives 210 records (3 fewer). This sensitivity check does not prove unique shoppers.
7 retained records explicitly disclose participation in a brand review contest. Removing those records gives. Incentive and purchase verification are otherwise not established; this single-source, self-selected sample is not representative of all buyers.
Same use: CeraVe Hydrating Facial Cleanser. Or browse cleansers.
These are catalogue links, not claims about equivalence.