Skip to content

Explore Revuei

Aveeno Protect + Hydrate SPF 50
Aveeno · Sunscreen

Protect + Hydrate SPF 50

Match the size and formula on the package you choose.

Review analysis available
322 review records · 2 recorded sources · 2015–2026
Sizenot listed
CategorySunscreen
What reviews said

How reviews felt.

Each bubble is one feeling, sized by how many reviews mention it. Hover, focus or tap a bubble to see the summaries.

Feelings from captured reviews. A review may express more than one feeling, so percentages need not total 100%.

  • delighted: 72 reviews, 24% of eligible reviews. Summaries: Leaves skin feeling hydrated. (20 reviews); Feels light on the skin. (12 reviews); Does not feel greasy or sticky. (12 reviews).
  • satisfied: 44 reviews, 15% of eligible reviews. Summaries: Leaves skin feeling hydrated. (11 reviews); Feels light on the skin. (7 reviews); Does not feel greasy or sticky. (7 reviews).
  • worried: 7 reviews, 2% of eligible reviews. .
  • surprised: 6 reviews, 2% of eligible reviews. .
PraiseComplaintDepends on skin Bubble size uses each review count on the same scale. No zero values are inferred.

Counts refer to reviews, not verified unique people. Groups can overlap. Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. Summaries are written by Revuei and do not reproduce reviews. Missing information is not inferred.

WHAT REVIEWS REPORTED

Topic by topic.

Each bar counts records that mentioned a topic, split by direction. Negative mentions extend left, positive mentions extend right, both on the same scale.

Coded records322
Recorded review source309
Picky reviews13
Topics published6
Topic← NegativePositive →Count

Texture

193 of 297 records mention this
160 + / 22 −54% / 7% of product discussion records
Feels light on the skin.38 reviewsDoes not feel greasy or sticky.31 reviewsBlends easily.26 reviews

Hydration

84 of 297 records mention this
81 + / 3 −27% / 1% of product discussion recordsFew negative reports so far
Leaves skin feeling hydrated.61 reviews

Scent

77 of 297 records mention this
61 + / 5 −21% / 2% of product discussion recordsFew negative reports so far
Scent is pleasant.7 reviewsLiked the scent.5 reviews

White cast

59 of 297 records mention this
55 + / 3 −19% / 1% of product discussion recordsFew negative reports so far
No white cast.22 reviewsDoes not leave a white cast.8 reviews

Value mentions

52 of 297 records mention this
46 + / 4 −15% / 1% of product discussion recordsFew negative reports so far
Considered good value.16 reviewsRated as a favorite.13 reviewsWould recommend.12 reviews

Irritation

40 of 297 records mention this
24 + / 16 −8% / 5% of product discussion records
No irritation reported.13 reviews

Read the limits.

Percentages are shares of the 297 analyzed records that discuss this product directly, not of all users. One record can mention several topics. Mixed, neutral and unclear mentions count toward topic totals but are not drawn as directions. Topic shares may differ by about ±10 percentage points. Topics with fewer than 40 mentions are not displayed. Formulas change — check the current package.

Recorded sources may overlap and are not necessarily independent. Counts describe review records, not unique people. How we count reviews

All counts
TopicMentionsPositiveNegativeMixedNeutralUnclear
Texture19316022650
Hydration84813000
Scent776151100
White cast59553010
Value mentions52464110
Irritation402416000
By skin and shade

What reviews described.

Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. These groups are smaller than the full review set.

Reviews with an explicit skin-type context; not a suitability prediction.

Self-described skin type

sensitiveself-described · attribute

23 reviews

Counts refer to reviews, not verified unique people. Groups can overlap. Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. Summaries are written by Revuei and do not reproduce reviews. Missing information is not inferred.

Our take

What the reviews support.

Every point shows the number of linked reviews behind it. These are observations, not efficacy or suitability claims.

Preference

What stands out

61 reviews · Leaves skin feeling hydrated.

61 reviews

Based on 61 reviews in the eligible set. Groups can overlap; this is not an efficacy or suitability claim.

Caution

What to watch

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

Use or shade

Use and shade

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

READ THE BOUNDARIES

Method & limits

Saved product facts and historical reviews do not establish current-formula equivalence, verified purchases, unique people, ingredient causation or suitability for your skin. Source counts may overlap and are not necessarily additive.

  • View official source

    Aveeno official Canada product page — source reviewed October 10, 2026 · Aveeno’s Canadian official page names AVEENO Protect + Hydrate® Moisturizing Sunscreen SPF 50. The SPF 50 wording is an official Canadian product designation; US formula equivalence and an exact SKU are unconfirmed.

How we count reviews · Report a correction

Skip to mobile content
REVUEI
Aveeno Protect + Hydrate SPF 50

Aveeno · Sunscreen

Protect + Hydrate SPF 50

Review analysis available322 review records · 2 recorded sources · 2015–2026
What reviews said

How reviews felt.

Each bubble is one feeling, sized by how many reviews mention it. Hover, focus or tap a bubble to see the summaries.

Feelings from captured reviews. A review may express more than one feeling, so percentages need not total 100%.

  • delighted: 72 reviews, 24% of eligible reviews. Summaries: Leaves skin feeling hydrated. (20 reviews); Feels light on the skin. (12 reviews); Does not feel greasy or sticky. (12 reviews).
  • satisfied: 44 reviews, 15% of eligible reviews. Summaries: Leaves skin feeling hydrated. (11 reviews); Feels light on the skin. (7 reviews); Does not feel greasy or sticky. (7 reviews).
  • worried: 7 reviews, 2% of eligible reviews. .
  • surprised: 6 reviews, 2% of eligible reviews. .
PraiseComplaintDepends on skin Bubble size uses each review count on the same scale. No zero values are inferred.

Counts refer to reviews, not verified unique people. Groups can overlap. Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. Summaries are written by Revuei and do not reproduce reviews. Missing information is not inferred.

Most discussed

Texture

193 mentions

160 positive · 22 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 6 · Neutral: 5 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 193 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Feels light on the skin.38 reviewsDoes not feel greasy or sticky.31 reviewsBlends easily.26 reviews

Hydration

84 mentions

81 positive · 3 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 84 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.61 reviews

Scent

77 mentions

61 positive · 5 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 10 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 77 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Scent is pleasant.7 reviewsLiked the scent.5 reviews
All 6 topics
Size: not listed

Match the size and formula on the package you choose.

Review topics

Counts of what reviews mentioned. Not a rating, not medical advice.

Texture

193 mentions

160 positive · 22 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 6 · Neutral: 5 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 193 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Feels light on the skin.38 reviewsDoes not feel greasy or sticky.31 reviewsBlends easily.26 reviews

Hydration

84 mentions

81 positive · 3 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 84 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.61 reviews

Scent

77 mentions

61 positive · 5 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 10 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 77 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Scent is pleasant.7 reviewsLiked the scent.5 reviews

White cast

59 mentions

55 positive · 3 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 1 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 59 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

No white cast.22 reviewsDoes not leave a white cast.8 reviews

Value mentions

52 mentions

46 positive · 4 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 1 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 52 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Considered good value.16 reviewsRated as a favorite.13 reviewsWould recommend.12 reviews

Irritation

40 mentions

24 positive · 16 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 40 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

No irritation reported.13 reviews
By skin and shade

What reviews described.

Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. These groups are smaller than the full review set.

Reviews with an explicit skin-type context; not a suitability prediction.

Self-described skin type

sensitiveself-described · attribute

23 reviews

Counts refer to reviews, not verified unique people. Groups can overlap. Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. Summaries are written by Revuei and do not reproduce reviews. Missing information is not inferred.

Our take

What the reviews support.

Every point shows the number of linked reviews behind it. These are observations, not efficacy or suitability claims.

Preference

What stands out

61 reviews · Leaves skin feeling hydrated.

61 reviews

Based on 61 reviews in the eligible set. Groups can overlap; this is not an efficacy or suitability claim.

Caution

What to watch

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

Use or shade

Use and shade

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

Ingredients

A complete ingredient list is not verified.

Where to buy

Match the size and formula on the package you choose.

More

Method & sources

322 review records · 2 recorded sources · 2015–2026

297 records discuss this product directly. Other-product, non-use and uncertain product references are excluded from topic counts, not silently reassigned.

5 of 322 review records contain promotion or received-product wording. This text-based check can miss undisclosed promotions and can include ordinary received-product wording. Promotion wording does not exclude a review from the analysis.

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points. They are not ratings or medical advice. Topics with fewer than 40 mentions are not displayed.

  • Source 1 · Recorded review source · 309 records
  • Source 2 · Picky reviews · 13 records

Recorded sources may overlap and are not necessarily independent.

Review dates: 2015-05-12 to 2026-09-28 (known for 322 of 322 records).

Collection dates: 2026-08-25 to 2026-10-27 (known for 322 of 322 records).

Historical reviews do not establish current-formula equivalence, verified purchases, ingredient causation or suitability for your skin. How we count reviews

All 6 topics

Counts of what reviews mentioned. Not a rating, not medical advice.

Texture

193 mentions

160 positive · 22 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 6 · Neutral: 5 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 193 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Feels light on the skin.38 reviewsDoes not feel greasy or sticky.31 reviewsBlends easily.26 reviews

Hydration

84 mentions

81 positive · 3 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 84 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.61 reviews

Scent

77 mentions

61 positive · 5 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 10 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 77 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Scent is pleasant.7 reviewsLiked the scent.5 reviews

White cast

59 mentions

55 positive · 3 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 1 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 59 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

No white cast.22 reviewsDoes not leave a white cast.8 reviews

Value mentions

52 mentions

46 positive · 4 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 1 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 52 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Considered good value.16 reviewsRated as a favorite.13 reviewsWould recommend.12 reviews

Irritation

40 mentions

24 positive · 16 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 40 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

No irritation reported.13 reviews

Where to buy

Match the size and formula on the package you choose.

We may earn a commission from links marked paid; this does not change our coverage or findings. Affiliate disclosure

No retailer link is recorded for this product.