Skip to content

Explore Revuei

Dr.Jart+ Cicapair Gentle Foam Cleanser for Sensitive Skin
Dr.Jart+ · Cleanser

Cicapair Gentle Foam Cleanser for Sensitive Skin

Match the size and formula on the package you choose.

Review analysis available
400 review records · 1 recorded source · 2025–2026
Sizenot listed
CategoryCleanser
What reviews said

How reviews felt.

Each bubble is one feeling, sized by how many reviews mention it. Hover, focus or tap a bubble to see the summaries.

Feelings from captured reviews. A review may express more than one feeling, so percentages need not total 100%.

  • delighted: 188 reviews, 48% of eligible reviews. Summaries: No irritation reported. (48 reviews); Leaves skin feeling clean. (44 reviews); Feels smooth. (40 reviews).
  • satisfied: 87 reviews, 22% of eligible reviews. Summaries: No irritation reported. (25 reviews); Removes makeup. (21 reviews); Feels smooth. (20 reviews).
  • surprised: 11 reviews, 3% of eligible reviews. .
  • excited: 11 reviews, 3% of eligible reviews. .
  • impressed: 11 reviews, 3% of eligible reviews. Summaries: No irritation reported. (5 reviews).
  • disappointed: 5 reviews, 1% of eligible reviews. .
PraiseComplaintDepends on skin Bubble size uses each review count on the same scale. No zero values are inferred.

Counts refer to reviews, not verified unique people. Groups can overlap. Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. Summaries are written by Revuei and do not reproduce reviews. Missing information is not inferred.

WHAT REVIEWS REPORTED

Topic by topic.

Each bar counts records that mentioned a topic, split by direction. Negative mentions extend left, positive mentions extend right, both on the same scale.

Coded records400
Sephora (Bazaarvoice)400
Topics published7
Topic← NegativePositive →Count

Texture

292 of 395 records mention this
260 + / 2 −66% / 1% of product discussion recordsFew negative reports so far
Feels smooth.77 reviewsFeels light on the skin.38 reviewsTexture felt pleasant.14 reviews

Cleansing

251 of 395 records mention this
236 + / 9 −60% / 2% of product discussion recordsFew negative reports so far
Leaves skin feeling clean.96 reviewsRemoves makeup.82 reviewsFeels gentle on the skin.24 reviews

Hydration

211 of 395 records mention this
191 + / 19 −48% / 5% of product discussion records
Leaves skin feeling hydrated.40 reviewsDoes not leave skin feeling dry.36 reviewsDoes not strip the skin.10 reviews

Scent

201 of 395 records mention this
127 + / 12 −32% / 3% of product discussion recordsFew negative reports so far
No scent.11 reviewsLiked the scent.9 reviewsStrong scent.8 reviews

Irritation

94 of 395 records mention this
81 + / 12 −21% / 3% of product discussion recordsFew negative reports so far
No irritation reported.99 reviewsNo irritation reported.16 reviews

Value mentions

69 of 395 records mention this
57 + / 8 −14% / 2% of product discussion recordsFew negative reports so far
Considered good value.14 reviewsWould repurchase.8 reviewsA little product goes a long way.8 reviews

Reported results

44 of 395 records mention this
44 + / 0 −11% / 0% of product discussion recordsFew negative reports so far
Reported that it worked for them.11 reviewsReported that it worked for them.5 reviews

Read the limits.

Includes reviews collected through brand promotions.

Percentages are shares of the 395 analyzed records that discuss this product directly, not of all users. One record can mention several topics. Mixed, neutral and unclear mentions count toward topic totals but are not drawn as directions. Topic shares may differ by about ±10 percentage points. Topics with fewer than 40 mentions are not displayed. Formulas change — check the current package.

262 of 400 captured records (66%) contain promotion or received-product wording. These records remain in the analysis. This text check can miss undisclosed promotions or include ordinary received-product wording.

Recorded sources may overlap and are not necessarily independent. Counts describe review records, not unique people. How we count reviews

All counts
TopicMentionsPositiveNegativeMixedNeutralUnclear
Texture29226020300
Cleansing2512369600
Hydration21119119100
Scent201127123590
Irritation948112100
Value mentions69578400
Reported results44440000
By skin and shade

What reviews described.

Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. These groups are smaller than the full review set.

Reviews with an explicit skin-type context; not a suitability prediction.

Self-described skin type

sensitiveself-described · attribute

99 reviews

Leaves skin feeling clean.31 reviewsNo irritation reported.26 reviewsFeels smooth.23 reviews
otherself-described · attribute

24 reviews

No irritation reported.11 reviewsLeaves skin feeling clean.8 reviewsFeels light on the skin.6 reviews
dryself-described · skin type

22 reviews

Leaves skin feeling clean.6 reviewsLeaves skin feeling hydrated.6 reviewsRemoves makeup.5 reviews
acne_proneself-described · attribute

16 reviews

Feels smooth.5 reviews

Counts refer to reviews, not verified unique people. Groups can overlap. Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. Summaries are written by Revuei and do not reproduce reviews. Missing information is not inferred.

Our take

What the reviews support.

Every point shows the number of linked reviews behind it. These are observations, not efficacy or suitability claims.

Preference

What stands out

99 reviews · No irritation reported.

99 reviews

Based on 99 reviews in the eligible set. Groups can overlap; this is not an efficacy or suitability claim.

Caution

What to watch

8 reviews · Strong scent.

8 reviews

Based on 8 reviews in the eligible set. Groups can overlap; this is not an efficacy or suitability claim.

Use or shade

Use and shade

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

READ THE BOUNDARIES

Method & limits

Saved product facts and historical reviews do not establish current-formula equivalence, verified purchases, unique people, ingredient causation or suitability for your skin. Source counts may overlap and are not necessarily additive.

  • View official source

    Dr.Jart+ US official product page — read October 10, 2026 · Name and product category.

How we count reviews · Report a correction

Skip to mobile content
REVUEI
Dr.Jart+ Cicapair Gentle Foam Cleanser for Sensitive Skin

Dr.Jart+ · Cleanser

Cicapair Gentle Foam Cleanser for Sensitive Skin

Review analysis available400 review records · 1 recorded source · 2025–2026
What reviews said

How reviews felt.

Each bubble is one feeling, sized by how many reviews mention it. Hover, focus or tap a bubble to see the summaries.

Feelings from captured reviews. A review may express more than one feeling, so percentages need not total 100%.

  • delighted: 188 reviews, 48% of eligible reviews. Summaries: No irritation reported. (48 reviews); Leaves skin feeling clean. (44 reviews); Feels smooth. (40 reviews).
  • satisfied: 87 reviews, 22% of eligible reviews. Summaries: No irritation reported. (25 reviews); Removes makeup. (21 reviews); Feels smooth. (20 reviews).
  • surprised: 11 reviews, 3% of eligible reviews. .
  • excited: 11 reviews, 3% of eligible reviews. .
  • impressed: 11 reviews, 3% of eligible reviews. Summaries: No irritation reported. (5 reviews).
  • disappointed: 5 reviews, 1% of eligible reviews. .
PraiseComplaintDepends on skin Bubble size uses each review count on the same scale. No zero values are inferred.

Counts refer to reviews, not verified unique people. Groups can overlap. Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. Summaries are written by Revuei and do not reproduce reviews. Missing information is not inferred.

Most discussed

Texture

292 mentions

260 positive · 2 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 30 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 292 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Feels smooth.77 reviewsFeels light on the skin.38 reviewsTexture felt pleasant.14 reviews

Cleansing

251 mentions

236 positive · 9 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 6 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 251 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves skin feeling clean.96 reviewsRemoves makeup.82 reviewsFeels gentle on the skin.24 reviews

Hydration

211 mentions

191 positive · 19 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 211 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.40 reviewsDoes not leave skin feeling dry.36 reviewsDoes not strip the skin.10 reviews
All 7 topics
Size: not listed

Match the size and formula on the package you choose.

Review topics

Counts of what reviews mentioned. Not a rating, not medical advice.

Texture

292 mentions

260 positive · 2 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 30 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 292 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Feels smooth.77 reviewsFeels light on the skin.38 reviewsTexture felt pleasant.14 reviews

Cleansing

251 mentions

236 positive · 9 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 6 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 251 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves skin feeling clean.96 reviewsRemoves makeup.82 reviewsFeels gentle on the skin.24 reviews

Hydration

211 mentions

191 positive · 19 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 211 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.40 reviewsDoes not leave skin feeling dry.36 reviewsDoes not strip the skin.10 reviews

Scent

201 mentions

127 positive · 12 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 3 · Neutral: 59 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 201 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

No scent.11 reviewsLiked the scent.9 reviewsStrong scent.8 reviews

Irritation

94 mentions

81 positive · 12 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 94 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

No irritation reported.99 reviewsNo irritation reported.16 reviews

Value mentions

69 mentions

57 positive · 8 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 4 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 69 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Considered good value.14 reviewsWould repurchase.8 reviewsA little product goes a long way.8 reviews

Reported results

44 mentions

44 positive · 0 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 44 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Reported that it worked for them.11 reviewsReported that it worked for them.5 reviews
By skin and shade

What reviews described.

Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. These groups are smaller than the full review set.

Reviews with an explicit skin-type context; not a suitability prediction.

Self-described skin type

sensitiveself-described · attribute

99 reviews

Leaves skin feeling clean.31 reviewsNo irritation reported.26 reviewsFeels smooth.23 reviews
otherself-described · attribute

24 reviews

No irritation reported.11 reviewsLeaves skin feeling clean.8 reviewsFeels light on the skin.6 reviews
dryself-described · skin type

22 reviews

Leaves skin feeling clean.6 reviewsLeaves skin feeling hydrated.6 reviewsRemoves makeup.5 reviews
acne_proneself-described · attribute

16 reviews

Feels smooth.5 reviews

Counts refer to reviews, not verified unique people. Groups can overlap. Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. Summaries are written by Revuei and do not reproduce reviews. Missing information is not inferred.

Our take

What the reviews support.

Every point shows the number of linked reviews behind it. These are observations, not efficacy or suitability claims.

Preference

What stands out

99 reviews · No irritation reported.

99 reviews

Based on 99 reviews in the eligible set. Groups can overlap; this is not an efficacy or suitability claim.

Caution

What to watch

8 reviews · Strong scent.

8 reviews

Based on 8 reviews in the eligible set. Groups can overlap; this is not an efficacy or suitability claim.

Use or shade

Use and shade

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

Ingredients

A complete ingredient list is not verified.

Where to buy

Match the size and formula on the package you choose.

More

Method & sources

400 review records · 1 recorded source · 2025–2026

Includes reviews collected through brand promotions

395 records discuss this product directly. Other-product, non-use and uncertain product references are excluded from topic counts, not silently reassigned.

262 of 400 review records contain promotion or received-product wording. This text-based check can miss undisclosed promotions and can include ordinary received-product wording. Promotion wording does not exclude a review from the analysis.

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points. They are not ratings or medical advice. Topics with fewer than 40 mentions are not displayed.

  • Source 1 · Sephora (Bazaarvoice) · 400 records

Recorded sources may overlap and are not necessarily independent.

Review dates: 2025-03-28 to 2026-05-19 (known for 400 of 400 records).

Collection dates: 2026-08-24 to 2026-08-24 (known for 400 of 400 records).

Historical reviews do not establish current-formula equivalence, verified purchases, ingredient causation or suitability for your skin. How we count reviews

All 7 topics

Counts of what reviews mentioned. Not a rating, not medical advice.

Texture

292 mentions

260 positive · 2 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 30 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 292 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Feels smooth.77 reviewsFeels light on the skin.38 reviewsTexture felt pleasant.14 reviews

Cleansing

251 mentions

236 positive · 9 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 6 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 251 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves skin feeling clean.96 reviewsRemoves makeup.82 reviewsFeels gentle on the skin.24 reviews

Hydration

211 mentions

191 positive · 19 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 211 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.40 reviewsDoes not leave skin feeling dry.36 reviewsDoes not strip the skin.10 reviews

Scent

201 mentions

127 positive · 12 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 3 · Neutral: 59 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 201 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

No scent.11 reviewsLiked the scent.9 reviewsStrong scent.8 reviews

Irritation

94 mentions

81 positive · 12 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 94 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

No irritation reported.99 reviewsNo irritation reported.16 reviews

Value mentions

69 mentions

57 positive · 8 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 4 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 69 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Considered good value.14 reviewsWould repurchase.8 reviewsA little product goes a long way.8 reviews

Reported results

44 mentions

44 positive · 0 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 44 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Reported that it worked for them.11 reviewsReported that it worked for them.5 reviews

Where to buy

Match the size and formula on the package you choose.

We may earn a commission from links marked paid; this does not change our coverage or findings. Affiliate disclosure

No retailer link is recorded for this product.