Skip to content

Explore Revuei

La Roche-Posay Lipikar AP+M Triple Repair Moisturizing Cream
La Roche-Posay · Moisturizer

Lipikar AP+M Triple Repair Moisturizing Cream

Fragrance-free Alcohol free Essential oil free Paraben free

Match the size and formula on the package you choose.

Review analysis available
400 review records · 1 recorded source · 2018–2026
Sizenot listed
CategoryMoisturizer
Ingredient listCaptured INCI · 28 ingredients
What reviews said

How reviews felt.

Each bubble is one feeling, sized by how many reviews mention it. Hover, focus or tap a bubble to see the summaries.

Feelings from captured reviews. A review may express more than one feeling, so percentages need not total 100%.

  • delighted: 122 reviews, 33% of eligible reviews. Summaries: Leaves skin feeling hydrated. (31 reviews); Feels smooth. (10 reviews); Considered good value. (8 reviews).
  • satisfied: 34 reviews, 9% of eligible reviews. Summaries: Leaves skin feeling hydrated. (7 reviews); No scent. (6 reviews).
  • disappointed: 13 reviews, 3% of eligible reviews. .
  • surprised: 11 reviews, 3% of eligible reviews. .
  • uncomfortable: 10 reviews, 3% of eligible reviews. .
  • skeptical: 6 reviews, 2% of eligible reviews. .
  • love: 6 reviews, 2% of eligible reviews. .
  • hate: 5 reviews, 1% of eligible reviews. .
  • frustrated: 5 reviews, 1% of eligible reviews. .
PraiseComplaintDepends on skin Bubble size uses each review count on the same scale. No zero values are inferred.

Counts refer to reviews, not verified unique people. Groups can overlap. Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. Summaries are written by Revuei and do not reproduce reviews. Missing information is not inferred.

WHAT REVIEWS REPORTED

Topic by topic.

Each bar counts records that mentioned a topic, split by direction. Negative mentions extend left, positive mentions extend right, both on the same scale.

Coded records400
PowerReviews review collection400
Topics published5
Topic← NegativePositive →Count

Hydration

224 of 373 records mention this
214 + / 9 −57% / 2% of product discussion recordsFew negative reports so far
Leaves skin feeling hydrated.75 reviewsLeaves skin feeling hydrated.14 reviews

Texture

209 of 373 records mention this
124 + / 43 −33% / 12% of product discussion records
Feels smooth.21 reviewsDoes not feel greasy or sticky.18 reviewsAbsorbs quickly.15 reviews

Reported results

68 of 373 records mention this
62 + / 6 −17% / 2% of product discussion recordsFew negative reports so far
Leaves a healthy-looking glow.8 reviewsReported that it worked for them.6 reviews

Scent

67 of 373 records mention this
27 + / 26 −7% / 7% of product discussion records
Strong scent.16 reviewsNo scent.13 reviews

Value mentions

47 of 373 records mention this
35 + / 6 −9% / 2% of product discussion recordsFew negative reports so far
Considered good value.24 reviewsWould repurchase.16 reviewsA little goes a long way.6 reviews

Read the limits.

Percentages are shares of the 373 analyzed records that discuss this product directly, not of all users. One record can mention several topics. Mixed, neutral and unclear mentions count toward topic totals but are not drawn as directions. Topic shares may differ by about ±10 percentage points. Topics with fewer than 40 mentions are not displayed. Formulas change — check the current package.

Recorded sources may overlap and are not necessarily independent. Counts describe review records, not unique people. How we count reviews

All counts
TopicMentionsPositiveNegativeMixedNeutralUnclear
Hydration2242149100
Texture2091244327150
Reported results68626000
Scent6727261130
Value mentions47356600
By skin and shade

What reviews described.

Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. These groups are smaller than the full review set.

Reviews with an explicit skin-type context; not a suitability prediction.

Self-described skin type

dryself-described · skin type

100 reviews

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.21 reviewsLeaves skin feeling hydrated.10 reviewsConsidered good value.9 reviews
otherself-described · attribute

69 reviews

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.18 reviewsConsidered good value.6 reviewsFeels smooth.6 reviews
sensitiveself-described · attribute

34 reviews

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.10 reviews
acne_proneself-described · attribute

15 reviews

Counts refer to reviews, not verified unique people. Groups can overlap. Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. Summaries are written by Revuei and do not reproduce reviews. Missing information is not inferred.

Our take

What the reviews support.

Every point shows the number of linked reviews behind it. These are observations, not efficacy or suitability claims.

Preference

What stands out

75 reviews · Leaves skin feeling hydrated.

75 reviews

Based on 75 reviews in the eligible set. Groups can overlap; this is not an efficacy or suitability claim.

Caution

What to watch

16 reviews · Strong scent.

16 reviews

Based on 16 reviews in the eligible set. Groups can overlap; this is not an efficacy or suitability claim.

Use or shade

Use and shade

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

INGREDIENTS

What’s inside

Captured ingredient record. Function notes describe common uses of an ingredient, not this product’s effect.

Observed 2026-10-21 · Market: US.

Check the current package; this record does not establish today’s formula.

Ingredients are listed from highest to lowest concentration down to 1%; ingredients under 1% can appear in any order.

Key ingredients

HydratingGlycerin

Helps skin hold on to water.

#3 of 28
BrighteningNiacinamide

A vitamin B3 form used for skin conditioning and tone.

#5 of 28
HydratingPropanediol

Helps a formula hold water and improves feel.

#11 of 28
Soothing & barrierCeramide Np

A skin-identical lipid used to support the barrier.

#13 of 28
AntioxidantTocopherol

An antioxidant used to slow oil oxidation.

#27 of 28
Full ingredient list (28)

  1. Aqua / Water/Eau
  2. Butyrospermum Parkii Butter / Shea Butter
  3. Glycerin
  4. Dimethicone
  5. Niacinamide
  6. Cetearyl Alcohol
  7. Brassica Campestris Seed Oil/Rapeseed Seed Oil
  8. Glyceryl Stearate
  9. Ammonium Polyacryloyldimethyl Taurate
  10. Peg-100 Stearate
  11. Propanediol
  12. Ophiopogon Japonicus Root Extract
  13. Ceramide Np
  14. Sorbitan Tristearate
  15. Dimethiconol
  16. Peg-20 Methyl Glucose Sesquistearate
  17. Sodium Chloride
  18. Mannose
  19. Coco-Betaine
  20. Disodium Edta
  21. Capryloyl Glycine
  22. Caprylyl Glycol
  23. Vitreoscilla Ferment
  24. Citric Acid
  25. Maltodextrin
  26. Xanthan Gum
  27. Tocopherol
  28. Pentaerythrityl Tetra-Di-T-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate
Ingredient source
READ THE BOUNDARIES

Method & limits

Saved product facts and historical reviews do not establish current-formula equivalence, verified purchases, unique people, ingredient causation or suitability for your skin. Source counts may overlap and are not necessarily additive.

  • View source →

    La Roche-Posay US — AP+MAX page and former-name statement — read October 10, 2026 · Current AP+MAX name and the brand’s earlier AP+M Balm name; historical naming reference only.

How we count reviews · Report a correction

Skip to mobile content
REVUEI
La Roche-Posay Lipikar AP+M Triple Repair Moisturizing Cream

La Roche-Posay · Moisturizer

Lipikar AP+M Triple Repair Moisturizing Cream

✓ Fragrance-free✓ Alcohol free✓ Essential oil free✓ Paraben free
Review analysis available400 review records · 1 recorded source · 2018–2026
What reviews said

How reviews felt.

Each bubble is one feeling, sized by how many reviews mention it. Hover, focus or tap a bubble to see the summaries.

Feelings from captured reviews. A review may express more than one feeling, so percentages need not total 100%.

  • delighted: 122 reviews, 33% of eligible reviews. Summaries: Leaves skin feeling hydrated. (31 reviews); Feels smooth. (10 reviews); Considered good value. (8 reviews).
  • satisfied: 34 reviews, 9% of eligible reviews. Summaries: Leaves skin feeling hydrated. (7 reviews); No scent. (6 reviews).
  • disappointed: 13 reviews, 3% of eligible reviews. .
  • surprised: 11 reviews, 3% of eligible reviews. .
  • uncomfortable: 10 reviews, 3% of eligible reviews. .
  • skeptical: 6 reviews, 2% of eligible reviews. .
  • love: 6 reviews, 2% of eligible reviews. .
  • hate: 5 reviews, 1% of eligible reviews. .
  • frustrated: 5 reviews, 1% of eligible reviews. .
PraiseComplaintDepends on skin Bubble size uses each review count on the same scale. No zero values are inferred.

Counts refer to reviews, not verified unique people. Groups can overlap. Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. Summaries are written by Revuei and do not reproduce reviews. Missing information is not inferred.

Most discussed

Hydration

224 mentions

214 positive · 9 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 224 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.75 reviewsLeaves skin feeling hydrated.14 reviews

Texture

209 mentions

124 positive · 43 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 27 · Neutral: 15 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 209 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Feels smooth.21 reviewsDoes not feel greasy or sticky.18 reviewsAbsorbs quickly.15 reviews

Reported results

68 mentions

62 positive · 6 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 68 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves a healthy-looking glow.8 reviewsReported that it worked for them.6 reviews
All 5 topics
Size: not listed

Match the size and formula on the package you choose.

Review topics

Counts of what reviews mentioned. Not a rating, not medical advice.

Hydration

224 mentions

214 positive · 9 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 224 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.75 reviewsLeaves skin feeling hydrated.14 reviews

Texture

209 mentions

124 positive · 43 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 27 · Neutral: 15 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 209 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Feels smooth.21 reviewsDoes not feel greasy or sticky.18 reviewsAbsorbs quickly.15 reviews

Reported results

68 mentions

62 positive · 6 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 68 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves a healthy-looking glow.8 reviewsReported that it worked for them.6 reviews

Scent

67 mentions

27 positive · 26 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 13 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 67 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Strong scent.16 reviewsNo scent.13 reviews

Value mentions

47 mentions

35 positive · 6 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 6 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 47 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Considered good value.24 reviewsWould repurchase.16 reviewsA little goes a long way.6 reviews
By skin and shade

What reviews described.

Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. These groups are smaller than the full review set.

Reviews with an explicit skin-type context; not a suitability prediction.

Self-described skin type

dryself-described · skin type

100 reviews

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.21 reviewsLeaves skin feeling hydrated.10 reviewsConsidered good value.9 reviews
otherself-described · attribute

69 reviews

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.18 reviewsConsidered good value.6 reviewsFeels smooth.6 reviews
sensitiveself-described · attribute

34 reviews

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.10 reviews
acne_proneself-described · attribute

15 reviews

Counts refer to reviews, not verified unique people. Groups can overlap. Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. Summaries are written by Revuei and do not reproduce reviews. Missing information is not inferred.

Our take

What the reviews support.

Every point shows the number of linked reviews behind it. These are observations, not efficacy or suitability claims.

Preference

What stands out

75 reviews · Leaves skin feeling hydrated.

75 reviews

Based on 75 reviews in the eligible set. Groups can overlap; this is not an efficacy or suitability claim.

Caution

What to watch

16 reviews · Strong scent.

16 reviews

Based on 16 reviews in the eligible set. Groups can overlap; this is not an efficacy or suitability claim.

Use or shade

Use and shade

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

Ingredients

Ingredient order does not establish concentration or finished-product efficacy.

GlycerinHelps skin hold on to water.NiacinamideA vitamin B3 form used for skin conditioning and tone.PropanediolHelps a formula hold water and improves feel.Ceramide NpA skin-identical lipid used to support the barrier.TocopherolAn antioxidant used to slow oil oxidation.
Full ingredient list · 28

Aqua / Water/Eau, Butyrospermum Parkii Butter / Shea Butter, Glycerin, Dimethicone, Niacinamide, Cetearyl Alcohol, Brassica Campestris Seed Oil/Rapeseed Seed Oil, Glyceryl Stearate, Ammonium Polyacryloyldimethyl Taurate, Peg-100 Stearate, Propanediol, Ophiopogon Japonicus Root Extract, Ceramide Np, Sorbitan Tristearate, Dimethiconol, Peg-20 Methyl Glucose Sesquistearate, Sodium Chloride, Mannose, Coco-Betaine, Disodium Edta, Capryloyl Glycine, Caprylyl Glycol, Vitreoscilla Ferment, Citric Acid, Maltodextrin, Xanthan Gum, Tocopherol, Pentaerythrityl Tetra-Di-T-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate

Ingredient source · 2026-10-21

Where to buy

Match the size and formula on the package you choose.

More

Method & sources

400 review records · 1 recorded source · 2018–2026

373 records discuss this product directly. Other-product, non-use and uncertain product references are excluded from topic counts, not silently reassigned.

63 of 400 review records contain promotion or received-product wording. This text-based check can miss undisclosed promotions and can include ordinary received-product wording. Promotion wording does not exclude a review from the analysis.

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points. They are not ratings or medical advice. Topics with fewer than 40 mentions are not displayed.

  • Source 1 · PowerReviews review collection · 400 records

Recorded sources may overlap and are not necessarily independent.

Review dates: 2018-01-08 to 2026-08-21 (known for 400 of 400 records).

Collection dates: 2026-08-25 to 2026-08-25 (known for 400 of 400 records).

Historical reviews do not establish current-formula equivalence, verified purchases, ingredient causation or suitability for your skin. How we count reviews

All 5 topics

Counts of what reviews mentioned. Not a rating, not medical advice.

Hydration

224 mentions

214 positive · 9 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 224 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.75 reviewsLeaves skin feeling hydrated.14 reviews

Texture

209 mentions

124 positive · 43 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 27 · Neutral: 15 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 209 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Feels smooth.21 reviewsDoes not feel greasy or sticky.18 reviewsAbsorbs quickly.15 reviews

Reported results

68 mentions

62 positive · 6 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 68 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves a healthy-looking glow.8 reviewsReported that it worked for them.6 reviews

Scent

67 mentions

27 positive · 26 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 13 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 67 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Strong scent.16 reviewsNo scent.13 reviews

Value mentions

47 mentions

35 positive · 6 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 6 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 47 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Considered good value.24 reviewsWould repurchase.16 reviewsA little goes a long way.6 reviews

Where to buy

Match the size and formula on the package you choose.

We may earn a commission from links marked paid; this does not change our coverage or findings. Affiliate disclosure

No retailer link is recorded for this product.