Skip to content

Explore Revuei

La Roche-Posay La Roche-Posay Toleriane Double Repair UV SPF Moisturizer for Face, Daily Facial Moisturizer with Sunscreen SPF 30, Niacinamide and Glycerin, Oil Free, Moisturizing Sun Protection
La Roche-Posay · Sunscreen

La Roche-Posay Toleriane Double Repair UV SPF Moisturizer for Face, Daily Facial Moisturizer with Sunscreen SPF 30, Niacinamide and Glycerin, Oil Free, Moisturizing Sun Protection

Fragrance-free Alcohol free Essential oil free Paraben free

Match the size and formula on the package you choose.

Review analysis available
400 review records · 1 recorded source · 2017–2026
Sizenot listed
CategorySunscreen
Ingredient listCaptured INCI · 29 ingredients
What reviews said

How reviews felt.

Each bubble is one feeling, sized by how many reviews mention it. Hover, focus or tap a bubble to see the summaries.

Feelings from captured reviews. A review may express more than one feeling, so percentages need not total 100%.

  • delighted: 108 reviews, 27% of eligible reviews. Summaries: Leaves skin feeling hydrated. (23 reviews); Does not feel greasy or sticky. (16 reviews); Feels light on the skin. (13 reviews).
  • disappointed: 32 reviews, 8% of eligible reviews. Summaries: Leaves skin feeling hydrated. (7 reviews).
  • satisfied: 25 reviews, 6% of eligible reviews. .
  • excited: 7 reviews, 2% of eligible reviews. .
  • surprised: 7 reviews, 2% of eligible reviews. .
PraiseComplaintDepends on skin Bubble size uses each review count on the same scale. No zero values are inferred.

Counts refer to reviews, not verified unique people. Groups can overlap. Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. Summaries are written by Revuei and do not reproduce reviews. Missing information is not inferred.

WHAT REVIEWS REPORTED

Topic by topic.

Each bar counts records that mentioned a topic, split by direction. Negative mentions extend left, positive mentions extend right, both on the same scale.

Coded records400
PowerReviews review collection400
Topics published9
Topic← NegativePositive →Count

Texture

224 of 398 records mention this
153 + / 49 −38% / 12% of product discussion records
Feels light on the skin.31 reviewsDoes not feel greasy or sticky.27 reviewsFeels smooth.24 reviews

Hydration

124 of 398 records mention this
101 + / 20 −25% / 5% of product discussion records
Leaves skin feeling hydrated.66 reviews

Pilling

72 of 398 records mention this
18 + / 51 −5% / 13% of product discussion records
Pills under other products.11 reviewsDid not pill.7 reviews

Eye sting

62 of 398 records mention this
8 + / 53 −2% / 13% of product discussion records
Stings the eyes.18 reviews

Breakouts

61 of 398 records mention this
26 + / 35 −7% / 9% of product discussion records
Reported breakouts or bumps.9 reviewsDoes not cause breakouts.5 reviews

White cast

49 of 398 records mention this
42 + / 6 −11% / 2% of product discussion recordsFew negative reports so far
Does not leave a white cast.10 reviewsNo white cast.10 reviews

Value mentions

47 of 398 records mention this
37 + / 6 −9% / 2% of product discussion recordsFew negative reports so far
Considered good value.18 reviewsWould repurchase.9 reviewsWould recommend.9 reviews

Irritation

44 of 398 records mention this
16 + / 26 −4% / 7% of product discussion records
Reported stinging, burning or irritation.13 reviews

Scent

43 of 398 records mention this
19 + / 11 −5% / 3% of product discussion recordsFew negative reports so far
Strong scent.8 reviews

Read the limits.

Percentages are shares of the 398 analyzed records that discuss this product directly, not of all users. One record can mention several topics. Mixed, neutral and unclear mentions count toward topic totals but are not drawn as directions. Topic shares may differ by about ±10 percentage points. Topics with fewer than 40 mentions are not displayed. Formulas change — check the current package.

Recorded sources may overlap and are not necessarily independent. Counts describe review records, not unique people. How we count reviews

All counts
TopicMentionsPositiveNegativeMixedNeutralUnclear
Texture224153491750
Hydration12410120201
Pilling721851300
Eye sting62853100
Breakouts612635000
White cast49426100
Value mentions47376400
Irritation441626200
Scent4319110121
By skin and shade

What reviews described.

Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. These groups are smaller than the full review set.

Reviews with an explicit skin-type context; not a suitability prediction.

Self-described skin type

sensitiveself-described · attribute

42 reviews

Feels light on the skin.6 reviews
dryself-described · skin type

41 reviews

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.9 reviews
combinationself-described · skin type

31 reviews

oilyself-described · skin type

25 reviews

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.5 reviews
acne_proneself-described · attribute

22 reviews

otherself-described · attribute

22 reviews

Counts refer to reviews, not verified unique people. Groups can overlap. Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. Summaries are written by Revuei and do not reproduce reviews. Missing information is not inferred.

Our take

What the reviews support.

Every point shows the number of linked reviews behind it. These are observations, not efficacy or suitability claims.

Preference

What stands out

66 reviews · Leaves skin feeling hydrated.

66 reviews

Based on 66 reviews in the eligible set. Groups can overlap; this is not an efficacy or suitability claim.

Caution

What to watch

18 reviews · Stings the eyes.

18 reviews

Based on 18 reviews in the eligible set. Groups can overlap; this is not an efficacy or suitability claim.

Use or shade

Use and shade

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

INGREDIENTS

What’s inside

Captured ingredient record. Function notes describe common uses of an ingredient, not this product’s effect.

Observed 2026-10-21 · Market: US.

Check the current package; this record does not establish today’s formula.

Ingredients are listed from highest to lowest concentration down to 1%; ingredients under 1% can appear in any order.

Key ingredients

HydratingGlycerin

Helps skin hold on to water.

#6 of 29
BrighteningNiacinamide

A vitamin B3 form used for skin conditioning and tone.

#9 of 29
Soothing & barrierAllantoin

A skin-conditioning agent used to soothe the look of irritation.

#14 of 29
Soothing & barrierCeramide NP

A skin-identical lipid used to support the barrier.

#15 of 29
AntioxidantTocopherol

An antioxidant used to slow oil oxidation.

#29 of 29
Full ingredient list (29)

  1. Avobenzone 3%
  2. Homosalate 5%
  3. Octisalate 5%
  4. Octocrylene 7%
  5. Water (La Roche-Posay Prebiotic Thermal Water)
  6. Glycerin
  7. Silica
  8. Dimethicone
  9. Niacinamide
  10. PEG-100 Stearate
  11. Glyceryl Stearate
  12. Stearic Acid
  13. Stearyl Alcohol
  14. Allantoin
  15. Ceramide NP
  16. Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer
  17. Sodium Hydroxide
  18. Myristic Acid
  19. Myristyl Alcohol
  20. Palmitic Acid
  21. Ammonium Polyacryloyldimethyl Taurate
  22. Disodium EDTA
  23. Capryloyl Glycine
  24. Caprylyl Glycol
  25. Citric Acid
  26. Xanthan Gum
  27. T-Butyl Alcohol
  28. Cetyl Alcohol
  29. Tocopherol
Ingredient source
READ THE BOUNDARIES

Method & limits

Saved product facts and historical reviews do not establish current-formula equivalence, verified purchases, unique people, ingredient causation or suitability for your skin. Source counts may overlap and are not necessarily additive.

  • View official source

    La Roche-Posay US — official product page — read October 10, 2026 · Primary product name and form, labeled SPF. No specific package, SKU, current offers, images, reviews or efficacy claims adopted.

How we count reviews · Report a correction

Skip to mobile content
REVUEI
La Roche-Posay La Roche-Posay Toleriane Double Repair UV SPF Moisturizer for Face, Daily Facial Moisturizer with Sunscreen SPF 30, Niacinamide and Glycerin, Oil Free, Moisturizing Sun Protection

La Roche-Posay · Sunscreen

La Roche-Posay Toleriane Double Repair UV SPF Moisturizer for Face, Daily Facial Moisturizer with Sunscreen SPF 30, Niacinamide and Glycerin, Oil Free, Moisturizing Sun Protection

✓ Fragrance-free✓ Alcohol free✓ Essential oil free✓ Paraben free
Review analysis available400 review records · 1 recorded source · 2017–2026
What reviews said

How reviews felt.

Each bubble is one feeling, sized by how many reviews mention it. Hover, focus or tap a bubble to see the summaries.

Feelings from captured reviews. A review may express more than one feeling, so percentages need not total 100%.

  • delighted: 108 reviews, 27% of eligible reviews. Summaries: Leaves skin feeling hydrated. (23 reviews); Does not feel greasy or sticky. (16 reviews); Feels light on the skin. (13 reviews).
  • disappointed: 32 reviews, 8% of eligible reviews. Summaries: Leaves skin feeling hydrated. (7 reviews).
  • satisfied: 25 reviews, 6% of eligible reviews. .
  • excited: 7 reviews, 2% of eligible reviews. .
  • surprised: 7 reviews, 2% of eligible reviews. .
PraiseComplaintDepends on skin Bubble size uses each review count on the same scale. No zero values are inferred.

Counts refer to reviews, not verified unique people. Groups can overlap. Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. Summaries are written by Revuei and do not reproduce reviews. Missing information is not inferred.

Most discussed

Texture

224 mentions

153 positive · 49 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 17 · Neutral: 5 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 224 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Feels light on the skin.31 reviewsDoes not feel greasy or sticky.27 reviewsFeels smooth.24 reviews

Hydration

124 mentions

101 positive · 20 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 2 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 1. Bar segments use this topic’s 124 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.66 reviews

Pilling

72 mentions

18 positive · 51 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 3 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 72 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Pills under other products.11 reviewsDid not pill.7 reviews
All 9 topics
Size: not listed

Match the size and formula on the package you choose.

Review topics

Counts of what reviews mentioned. Not a rating, not medical advice.

Texture

224 mentions

153 positive · 49 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 17 · Neutral: 5 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 224 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Feels light on the skin.31 reviewsDoes not feel greasy or sticky.27 reviewsFeels smooth.24 reviews

Hydration

124 mentions

101 positive · 20 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 2 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 1. Bar segments use this topic’s 124 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.66 reviews

Pilling

72 mentions

18 positive · 51 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 3 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 72 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Pills under other products.11 reviewsDid not pill.7 reviews

Eye sting

62 mentions

8 positive · 53 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 62 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Stings the eyes.18 reviews

Breakouts

61 mentions

26 positive · 35 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 61 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Reported breakouts or bumps.9 reviewsDoes not cause breakouts.5 reviews

White cast

49 mentions

42 positive · 6 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 49 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Does not leave a white cast.10 reviewsNo white cast.10 reviews

Value mentions

47 mentions

37 positive · 6 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 4 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 47 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Considered good value.18 reviewsWould repurchase.9 reviewsWould recommend.9 reviews

Irritation

44 mentions

16 positive · 26 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 2 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 44 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Reported stinging, burning or irritation.13 reviews

Scent

43 mentions

19 positive · 11 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 12 · Unclear: 1. Bar segments use this topic’s 43 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Strong scent.8 reviews
By skin and shade

What reviews described.

Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. These groups are smaller than the full review set.

Reviews with an explicit skin-type context; not a suitability prediction.

Self-described skin type

sensitiveself-described · attribute

42 reviews

Feels light on the skin.6 reviews
dryself-described · skin type

41 reviews

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.9 reviews
combinationself-described · skin type

31 reviews

oilyself-described · skin type

25 reviews

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.5 reviews
acne_proneself-described · attribute

22 reviews

otherself-described · attribute

22 reviews

Counts refer to reviews, not verified unique people. Groups can overlap. Skin type and shade are self-reported where recorded. Summaries are written by Revuei and do not reproduce reviews. Missing information is not inferred.

Our take

What the reviews support.

Every point shows the number of linked reviews behind it. These are observations, not efficacy or suitability claims.

Preference

What stands out

66 reviews · Leaves skin feeling hydrated.

66 reviews

Based on 66 reviews in the eligible set. Groups can overlap; this is not an efficacy or suitability claim.

Caution

What to watch

18 reviews · Stings the eyes.

18 reviews

Based on 18 reviews in the eligible set. Groups can overlap; this is not an efficacy or suitability claim.

Use or shade

Use and shade

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

Not enough linked review evidence for this suggestion yet.

Ingredients

Ingredient order does not establish concentration or finished-product efficacy.

GlycerinHelps skin hold on to water.NiacinamideA vitamin B3 form used for skin conditioning and tone.AllantoinA skin-conditioning agent used to soothe the look of irritation.Ceramide NPA skin-identical lipid used to support the barrier.TocopherolAn antioxidant used to slow oil oxidation.
Full ingredient list · 29

Avobenzone 3%, Homosalate 5%, Octisalate 5%, Octocrylene 7%, Water (La Roche-Posay Prebiotic Thermal Water), Glycerin, Silica, Dimethicone, Niacinamide, PEG-100 Stearate, Glyceryl Stearate, Stearic Acid, Stearyl Alcohol, Allantoin, Ceramide NP, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Sodium Hydroxide, Myristic Acid, Myristyl Alcohol, Palmitic Acid, Ammonium Polyacryloyldimethyl Taurate, Disodium EDTA, Capryloyl Glycine, Caprylyl Glycol, Citric Acid, Xanthan Gum, T-Butyl Alcohol, Cetyl Alcohol, Tocopherol

Ingredient source · 2026-10-21

Where to buy

Match the size and formula on the package you choose.

More

Method & sources

400 review records · 1 recorded source · 2017–2026

398 records discuss this product directly. Other-product, non-use and uncertain product references are excluded from topic counts, not silently reassigned.

2 of 400 review records contain promotion or received-product wording. This text-based check can miss undisclosed promotions and can include ordinary received-product wording. Promotion wording does not exclude a review from the analysis.

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points. They are not ratings or medical advice. Topics with fewer than 40 mentions are not displayed.

  • Source 1 · PowerReviews review collection · 400 records

Recorded sources may overlap and are not necessarily independent.

Review dates: 2017-02-28 to 2026-07-26 (known for 400 of 400 records).

Collection dates: 2026-08-24 to 2026-08-24 (known for 400 of 400 records).

Historical reviews do not establish current-formula equivalence, verified purchases, ingredient causation or suitability for your skin. How we count reviews

All 9 topics

Counts of what reviews mentioned. Not a rating, not medical advice.

Texture

224 mentions

153 positive · 49 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 17 · Neutral: 5 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 224 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Feels light on the skin.31 reviewsDoes not feel greasy or sticky.27 reviewsFeels smooth.24 reviews

Hydration

124 mentions

101 positive · 20 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 2 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 1. Bar segments use this topic’s 124 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Leaves skin feeling hydrated.66 reviews

Pilling

72 mentions

18 positive · 51 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 3 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 72 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Pills under other products.11 reviewsDid not pill.7 reviews

Eye sting

62 mentions

8 positive · 53 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 62 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Stings the eyes.18 reviews

Breakouts

61 mentions

26 positive · 35 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 61 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Reported breakouts or bumps.9 reviewsDoes not cause breakouts.5 reviews

White cast

49 mentions

42 positive · 6 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 1 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 49 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Does not leave a white cast.10 reviewsNo white cast.10 reviews

Value mentions

47 mentions

37 positive · 6 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 4 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 47 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Considered good value.18 reviewsWould repurchase.9 reviewsWould recommend.9 reviews

Irritation

44 mentions

16 positive · 26 negative

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 2 · Neutral: 0 · Unclear: 0. Bar segments use this topic’s 44 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Reported stinging, burning or irritation.13 reviews

Scent

43 mentions

19 positive · 11 negative

Few negative reports so far

Topic counts & limits

Topic shares are estimates from automated review coding and may differ by about ±10 percentage points.

Mixed: 0 · Neutral: 12 · Unclear: 1. Bar segments use this topic’s 43 mentions. The remainder is not inferred as positive or negative.

A review can mention several topics. Counts describe captured records, not unique people or population rates.

Strong scent.8 reviews

Where to buy

Match the size and formula on the package you choose.

We may earn a commission from links marked paid; this does not change our coverage or findings. Affiliate disclosure

No retailer link is recorded for this product.